Yankees - Las Vegas Nightclubs - Message Board, Forum & Trip Reports

Yankees

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by blibblab View Post
    And as far as the Yankees "buying championships"? That's bull - many MLB fans would love to have an ownership dedicated to putting out a quality product every year. They spend, sure, but what else are they supposed to do? Fritter away their franchise like the Royals or Pirates? And spending doesn't always equal championships (see the Mets, meet the Mets, come on out and greet the Mets...).

    agreed!!!!!!!!!!
    it's that time again, let's get #28 gentleman....for the boss

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by royale View Post
      Whats the deal with Mo throwing spit balls? Some crazy LA news people are making a big deal out of nothing. This is from Game 3, the one the Angels won...

      http://www.halosheaven.com/2009/10/1...spitball-video
      its nonsense MLB ruled that he DID NOT spit on the ball!!!!
      it's that time again, let's get #28 gentleman....for the boss

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by BarrelO View Post
        And looked what happened to all of them. They either jacked up their payroll to remain competitive or fell apart after they couldn't afford to keep their good players. I'm not saying it's impossible for small-market teams to be competitive. But it is close to impossible for them to be consistent contenders year after year. Pretty much the only way a small-market team can hope to compete is to play its cards exactly right and stockpile young talent that will hopefully develop into a competitive team. And then they let those players go when they can no longer afford to keep them and the cycle begins anew. Look, I'm not taking anything away from the Yankees. They're a well-run organization that does a lot of things right. But you can't deny that for big-market teams, the margin of error is a lot larger and the window of opportunity remains open a lot longer.
        so is it best for noone to spend money??? of course the "big market" teams hold an advantage...hence the "big market" !every sports athletes dream is to play in a big market cause with that comes nike deals and other huge endorsements, and big market teams have an advantage because they have a bigger fan base which means more ticket and merchandise sales which increases revenue, it allows them to have their own cable networks which makes them a billion dollars a year, thats the way it goes.....MLB made every attempt to cure that by charging a penalty to big market teams and give it to small market teams and a team like milwaukee pockets the cash.....based on the theory that "its not fair" we should just have every game end in a tie and every player make the exact same amount of money and see what happens to the interest in the game
        it's that time again, let's get #28 gentleman....for the boss

        Comment


        • #64
          haha this debate will go on forever... there is no way to solve it. A salary cap will never be impossed. The players association will never let it happen, and if MLB does try it we'll have another 1994 on our hands...

          But Jesus does hate the Yankees...
          [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-1SjyMtkpg[/ame]
          Vegas: May 2 - May 5
          Hotel: Mandalay Bay - Vista Suite
          5/2 - Vanity
          5/3 - XS
          5/4 - Carnival Court and Downtown

          Comment


          • #65
            bahahhahahha

            [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYJJ-4C1xw8&feature=fvw[/ame]
            Blackout Artist
            [email protected]

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by nyc2vegas View Post
              so is it best for noone to spend money???
              No, I propose the exact opposite. Keep the revenue sharing system, but MAKE THEM SPEND THE MONEY. It makes no sense to allow teams to make a profit while making no effort to field a competitive team.

              As for interest in the game, the NFL, which has a ridiculous amount of structures in place to ensure competitive balance, is the most profitable sports league in the world. I don't think that's a coincidence.
              The only winning move is not to play.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by BarrelO View Post
                No, I propose the exact opposite. Keep the revenue sharing system, but MAKE THEM SPEND THE MONEY. It makes no sense to allow teams to make a profit while making no effort to field a competitive team.

                As for interest in the game, the NFL, which has a ridiculous amount of structures in place to ensure competitive balance, is the most profitable sports league in the world. I don't think that's a coincidence.
                even if you "make" them spend the money the athletes still will not go to a place like Kansas city or milwaukee when boston, NY, and LA on interested because of endorsement deals and exposure through cable networks.
                it's that time again, let's get #28 gentleman....for the boss

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by nyc2vegas View Post
                  its nonsense MLB ruled that he DID NOT spit on the ball!!!!
                  Yup.. just making sh*t up cause they are losing. Alteast the ump fessed up on the errors. Either ways its all over tonight.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by royale View Post
                    Yup.. just making sh*t up cause they are losing. Alteast the ump fessed up on the errors. Either ways its all over tonight.
                    whoa whoa hold up!! I of all people know thats its not over till rosie o donnell sings her big fat ass off!!!!! with computers and lasers and microchips nowadays there really isnt even a need for umps!!! just like tennis does, puts a laser beam down the fair lines and fair poles and on top of the wall as well as a strike zone and a little microchip in the ball and all the human error will be removed from the game and the yanks would have only won 8-1!!!!
                    it's that time again, let's get #28 gentleman....for the boss

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      that missed call ended the game. they were preparing a comeback, but realized the umps had already been bought, so they gave up.
                      Blackout Artist
                      [email protected]

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by nyc2vegas View Post
                        even if you "make" them spend the money the athletes still will not go to a place like Kansas city or milwaukee when boston, NY, and LA on interested because of endorsement deals and exposure through cable networks.
                        That point is debatable (and experiences in other sports would seem to indicate otherwise). But what this conversation really does for me is highlight what a fundamentally stupid and irrational thing sports fandom is. I mean, if the people who own the team don't give a shit whether it wins or loses, why should you?
                        The only winning move is not to play.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by nyc2vegas View Post
                          whoa whoa hold up!! I of all people know thats its not over till rosie o donnell sings her big fat ass off!!!!! with computers and lasers and microchips nowadays there really isnt even a need for umps!!! just like tennis does, puts a laser beam down the fair lines and fair poles and on top of the wall as well as a strike zone and a little microchip in the ball and all the human error will be removed from the game and the yanks would have only won 8-1!!!!
                          hahah they got this one on lock.. Trust me. I know the angels will go down without ever putting in a fight..

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by dnix View Post
                            that missed call ended the game. they were preparing a comeback, but realized the umps had already been bought, so they gave up.
                            how come I have not heard shit about the missed call AGAINST the yankees on the tag up?
                            it's that time again, let's get #28 gentleman....for the boss

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by nyc2vegas View Post
                              how come I have not heard shit about the missed call AGAINST the yankees on the tag up?
                              they had to make it look even. didnt want it to be obvious they were in the yankees pocket.
                              Blackout Artist
                              [email protected]

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by dnix View Post
                                they had to make it look even. didnt want it to be obvious they were in the yankees pocket.
                                yup......how many shooters were there in the kennedy assassination again???
                                it's that time again, let's get #28 gentleman....for the boss

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                There are no results that meet this criteria.

                                Working...
                                X